第七届国际法律语言学大会在英国召开-特别报道-专题报道-学术动态-刘蔚铭：法律语言学研究网

特别报道：第七届国际法律语言学大会在英国召开

第七届国际法律语言学大会大会议程安排

Conference Programme

Day 1:Friday July 1st 2005

11.00 –1.00	Registration -Humanities Refectory (Ground Floor,Humanities Building -No 16on campus map)
12.45 –1.45	Welcome Lunch -Humanities Refectory (Ground Floor,Humanities Building)
1.45-2.15	Conference Opening and Welcome -Room 2.01(2nd Floor,Humanities Building)
2.30-6.00	Parallel Sessions -Rooms 2.01and 2.03(2nd Floor,Humanities Building)

	Room 2.01	Room 2.03
2.30-3.00	Chair: Tim Grant Hannes Kniffka Bonn University Orthographic Data in forensic linguistic authorship analysis	Chair: Sue Blackwell Bart DeFrancq Ghent University Europe's constitution:a terminological battleground
3.00-3.30	Georgia Frantzeskou,Efstathios Stamatatos and Stefanos Gritzalis University of the Aegean,Greece Source Code Authorship Analysis using N-grams	Richard Creech Attorney-at-Law Language Law and Celtic Identity in the European Union
3.30-4.00	Tea/Coffee	Tea/Coffee
4.00-4.30	Chair: Malcolm Coulthard Sam Tomblin Cardiff University Author Online:Evaluating the Use of the World Wide Web in Cases of Forensic Authorship Analysis	Chair: Diana Eades Isabel Gomez Diez Universiteit Antwerpen (Belgium)and Universidad Pompeu Fabra (Spain) The transformation of asylum seekers’narratives through the asylum procedure
4.30-5.00	Tim Grant University of Leicester Quantifying evidence in forensic authorship analysis	Yves Talla Sando Ouafeu Universität Freiburg in Breigau,Germany The Use of Prosodic clues in the identification of the national origin of English-speaking African Asylum seekers in Germany:Focus on Cameroon and Nigerian English speakers
5.00-5.30	Carole Chaski Institute for Linguistic Evidence,Inc Alternative Distance Measures for Validating the Syntactic Analysis Method	Susanne van der Kleij Radboud University Nijmegen/Ministry of Justice,The Netherlands Interruptions in Asylum Narratives at the Dutch Immigration Service
5.30-6.00	Marta Sanchez,Jaume Llopis and M.Teresa Turell Universitat Pompeu Fabra,Barcelona Intra and Inter-author comparisons:the case of function Words:Are function words really functional in stylometric studies of authorship attribution?	Victor J.Boucher Universitéde Montréal On the measurable linguistic correlates of deceit in recounting passed events
6.00-6.15	Transfer to Julian Hodge Lecture Theatre for Plenary

6.15 -7.15pm

Plenary Talk -Julian Hodge Building Lecture Theatre

Detective Inspector Kerry Marlow

The Development of Investigative Interviewing:
Anew phenomenon in British policing

7.30pm

Welcome drinks reception

(University Main Building)

Sponsored by Palgrave

Wine and Nibbles

Day 2:Saturday July 2nd 2005

	Room 2.01	Room 2.03
9.00-9.30	Chair: Chris Heffer Roger Shuy Georgetown University When All Else Fails,Be Ambiguous:A Prosecution Strategy in the International Criminal Tribunal on Yugoslavia	Chair: Krzysztof Kredens Jordi Cicres and M Teresa Turell Universitat Pompeu Fabra,Barcelona Short and long-term variation in intonation patterns:a preliminary study for speaker identification
9.30-10.00	Ogone John Obiero Maseno University,Kenya Injustice in Discourse of Cross-Examination	Peter Smith and Gea de Jong City University,London Speaker Identification:Function Words and Beyond
10.00-10.30	Amy Wang Lancaster University When precision meets vagueness:a corpus-assisted approach to vagueness in Taiwanese and British courtrooms	Viktoria Papp Rice University,Houston TX Perception of similar voices and the similarity criterion in voice lineups
10.30-11.00	Farinde Raifu Olanrewaju University of Wales,Bangor Power and Asymmetries in the Nigerian Courtroom System	Mark Griffiths Cardiff University Towards the audiofit -non-linguists’perceptions and articulations of unknown voices in a forensic context
11.00-11.30	Tea/Coffee	Tea/Coffee
11.30-12.00	Chair: John Gibbons Robert Rodman,Erik Eriksson and Robert Hubal North Carolina State University,USA,UmeåUniversity, Sweden and RTI International,North Carolina,USA Deducing emotions from speech:Forensic implications	No parallel session
12.00-12.30	Allan Bell Auckland University of Technology Advocating indigenous language rights in the courts:Maori language television in Aotearoa/New Zealand
12.30-1.00	Du Jinbang Guangdong University of Foreign Studies Information Processing and Utilization in Courtroom Interactions
1.00-2.00	Lunch	Lunch
2.00-2.30	Chair: Gill Grebler Ruth Lanouette Lawrence University,USA An Examination of a Pro Se Defense	Chair: Peter Tiersma Nicola Langton Cardiff University Cleaning up the Act
2.30-3.00	Judith Rochecouste and Rhonda Oliver Monash University and Edith Cowan University,Australia Evidential strategies used by expert witnesses	Sophie Cacciaguidi-Fahy National University of Ireland,Galway The ‘liaison dangereuse’between individual liability and collective guilt:interpreting the language of Article 7(1)of the ICTYstatute
3.00-3.30	Fleur van der Houwen University of Southern California Negotiating disputes through formulations and decisions	Wojciech Kwarcinski Adam Mickiewicz University,Poznan,Poland Some parallels between pragmalinguistic and legal models of interpretation
3.30-4.00	Tea/Coffee	Tea/Coffee
4.00-4.30	Chair: Dennis Kurzon Godfrey A.Steele University of the West Indies,St.Augustine The language of the law and the interpretation of the law: Issues of language and communication	Chair: Richard Creech Chris Heffer Nottingham Trent University,UK Jury Instruction as Communication Process
4.30-5.00	Luciana Romano Morilas UNESP Araraquara,São Paulo,Brazil Interaction and power in written Brazilian forensic texts	Michael Walsh University of Sydney,Australia Educating the judge?Linguistic evidence in Native Title and land claim cases in Australia
5.00-5.30	Larry Solan Brooklyn Law School Pernicious Ambiguity in Legal Texts	Weiming Liu Northwest University of Political Science &Law,Xi'an, Shaanxi,P.R.China Illocutionary and Perlocutionary Acts in Chinese Judge’s Attached Discourse
5.30-7.00	Break

Aberdare Hall

7pm

Pre-Dinner Drinks Reception

7.30pm

IAFL Cardiff Conference Dinner

Day 3:Sunday July 3rd 2005

9.15-10.15 am

Julian Hodge Building Lecture Theatre

IAFL Keynote Speaker:

Professor John Gibbons

Hong Kong Baptist University /University of Sydney

President of the International Association of Forensic Linguists

Pressure Points:How witnesses come to agree with what they do not believe

	Room 2.01	Room 2.03	Room X0.04
10.30-11.00	Chair: Peter Patrick Dennis Kurzon University of Haifa,Israel Interpretation without linguistics:The case of Newdow	Chair: Carole Chaski Krzysztof Kredens University of Lodz Lexicography and the ownership of language –a case study
11.00-11.30	Tea/Coffee	Tea/Coffee
11.30-12.00	Chair: Janet Cotterill Terry Royce Teachers College,Columbia University (Tokyo,Japan) The Negotiator and the Bomber:an interactive analysis of active listening in crisis negotiations	Chair: Maite Turell María Ángeles Orts Universidad de Murcia Business,company or corporation?The hidden dimension to contemplate when translating Company Law into Spanish
12.00-12.30	Ron Butters and Jackson Nichols Duke University What Can Go Wrong When Linguists Testify in American Trademark Litigation	Blake Stephen Howald University of Detroit Mercy School of Law Comparative and Non-Comparative Forensic Linguistic Analysis Techniques:Methodologies for Negotiating the Interface of Linguistics and Evidentiary Jurisprudence in American Criminal Procedure
12.30-1.00	Break	Break
1.00-2.00	Lunch	Lunch
2.00-2.30	Chair: Frances Rock Burns Cooper University of Alaska Fairbanks Justice a la Mode:Potential pitfalls of electronic modes of courtroom discourse	Chair: Silke Kirschner Alma Ortiz CELE-UNAM-MÉXICO Foreign Language Learning Centre –National Autonomous University of México Testing the Reading Ability of University Law Students in Mexico	Symposium: NB 2.00-5.30 Language analysis in Asylum Cases:Defining a New Branch of Forensic Linguistics (Coordinator:Maaike Verrips) Welcome:defining a new branch of forensic linguistics Maaike Verrips,de Taalstudio
2.30-3.00	Alison Johnson University of Birmingham "From where are sat"Achieving a change of state in suspect and witness knowledge through evaluation in the police interview	Christian Braun,Silvia Hansen-Schirra,Kerstin Kunz and Stella Neumann Saarland University The Syntactic Complexity of German Legalese -An Empirical Approach	NB 2.00-5.30 Forensic linguistics and language analysis in asylum seeker cases:The development of Guidelines by an international group of linguists Diana Eades,University of New England LINGUA -More than guidelines Eric Baltisberger,LINGUA On the collection of ‘useful and reliable data’ Maaike Verrips &Suzanne Dikker,de Taalstudio Problems, prospects and perspectives on language analysis in UK refugee status determination Peter L Patrick,University of Essex,&Nick Oakeshott,Refugee Legal Centre The use of spontaneous or elicited loanwords in determining national origin/socialization in cases of languages spoken in more than one country:a procedure Dieke Rietkerk,freelance language analyst The significance of Sudan for forensic linguistics Al-Amin Abu-Manga,University of Khartoum Discussion [Alternate paper:Supplementing the Language Analyst’s Intuitions with Empirical Consultation Work on Acceptability,Oscar Nkulu,freelance linguist] NB 2.00-5.30
3.00-3.30	Susan Berk-Seligson Vanderbilt University False confession:linguistic and extralinguistic evidence of coercion in a police interrogation	Maurice Varney "You have already won a guaranteed major prize".The use of language to deceive and rob
3.30-4.00	Tea/Coffee	Tea/Coffee
4.00-4.30	Chair: Ron Butters Deborah Bradford and Jane Goodman-Delahunty University of New South Wales Truthful vs.deceptive confessions:Investigating the performance of statement analysis techniques at detecting deception in the confessional context	Chair: Michelle Aldridge Bencie Woll and Joanna Atkinson City University London Deaf and No Language:Communication and the Law
4.30-5.00	Margaret van Naerssen Immaculata University and University of Pennsylvania Testing for Possible Faking of Language Proficiency by Defendants	Frances Rock Roehampton University Writing rights right or writing them off?The utility of written rights information in police custody
5.00-5.30	Gill Grebler Linguistic and Cultural Forensics “And then what did she say?”making confession statements believable and compelling (even when they are false)	Amy Pi-Chan Hu National Cheng-chi University,Taipei,Taiwan On the Precision of Pronouns:The Mountain Is Ours
5.30-6.00	Mel Greenlee California Appellate Project “At that time my speaking doesn’t make any sense”: Interpreters and capital error
6.00-7.00	IAFL AGM-Room 2.01
7.30	Dinner Cardiff Bay (self-financed but transport provided!)

Day 4: Monday July 4th 2005

	Room 2.01	Room 2.03
9.00-10.30	Symposium 1: Plain Language and Transparent Legal System for Lay People (Coordinator:Mami Hiraike Okawara)	Symposium 2: Studies in Forensic Linguistics for Pre-Law Students (Coordinator:William G.Eggington)
10.30-11.00	Tea/Coffee	Tea/Coffee
11.30-12.00	Chair: Mami Okawara Michelle Aldridge and June Luchjenbroers Cardiff University and University of Wales,Bangor Questions, Metaphors and Frames:Methods of manipulation,and subsequent analysis	Chair: Susan Berk-Seligson Sandra Evans The University of the West Indies,St.Augustine Campus, Trinidad and Tobago The Use of Court Clerks as 'Makeshift'Legal Interpreters in St Lucian Courts
12.00-12.30	Sue Blackwell,Jess Shapero and Willem Meijs University of Birmingham Texts of Murder and Martyrdom	Clive Forrester University of the West Indies,Mona,Jamaica The Discourse of Time in the Jamaican Courtroom: Creole speaking witness meets English speaking counsel
12.30-1.00	Richard Powell Nihon Unversity,Tokyo Motivations for codeswitching in Malaysian courtrooms
1.00-2.00	Lunch	Lunch
2.00-2.30	Chair: Alison Johnson Silke Kirschner Serious Crime Analysis Section,National Crime and Operations Faculty Behavioural consistency?Linguistic concepts of variation and the analysis of speech in case linkage	Chair: Michael Walsh Natalie Stroud Monash University,Melbourne,Australia The Koori Court in Victoria:a response to the over-representation of Indigenous Australians in the Criminal Justice System
2.30-3.00	Cecilia Joseph University of Malaya and Cardiff University Listening to manage resistance to talk:Balancing neutrality and affiliation in forensic interviews with children	Lysbeth Ford and Dominic McCormack Batchelor Institute of Indigenous Tertiary Education,NT Australia and MARLUK Link-Up,Darwin,NT Australia The Murrinh-patha Legal Glossary:a bridge between laws
3.00-3.30	Carol Morgan Children's Justice Center of Utah County /Child Witness Institute, Portland “What happens”in child forensic interviewing:Increasing event detail by improving narrative elicitation
3.30-4.00	Tea/coffee and goodbyes

2005年7月18日